
But the determination of what makes a president influential
depends almost entirely on the pulse of the people at the time of their
reign. How a nation or people feel about
a leader after the fact really makes no difference in understanding the
profound influences that leader had during his or her tenure in office.
If you’re liberal you look upon Franklin Delano Roosevelt
with extreme admiration for the very same reasons that a conservative might
look upon him as the devil incarnate.
The same is true with Ronald Wilson Reagan (even though he was an actor
that was his true given name) who had a polarizing effect on his detractors and
a magnetic influence over those who looked up to him and his positive
outlook. In both instances the history
of how we felt has nothing to do with what we currently believe, even if what
we now believe is exactly what we think we believed back then…Wow that sounds
positively Freudian…or maybe it just makes no sense whatsoever.
The point I’m trying to make is that during a leaders
leadership the mood of the people is strongly swayed though an emotional
response to whatever stimulus is portrayed though the media, discussions and
feelings about whatever issues are forefront in our minds at the time, and has
very little to do with the facts or the reality of that particular time.
There is an important distinction that needs to be addressed
and that is that facts are not disputable.
There may be disagreements about what constitutes a fact but when a fact
is formalized and quantified it morphs into a truth and truths are not
debatable. You may not like the truth or
you may not be able to “handle” the truth but truth is a constant and I should
mention a rare event in our world of constant information overload. So even though facts may not have much of an
impact on our current opinions of a sitting leader those facts when constituted
do show the reality of those impacts and influences.
What does that have to do with how leaders influence their
respective countries? I’m glad you
asked. This is obviously my opinion and
sense I am the author of this piece then I have the right to bloviate and
pontificate, even if just a little.
President Obama has had a profound influence for both those who follow
him religiously and for those who for religious reasons do not. The fractured electorate may be some
indication but they seem to always be a bit fractured and are almost always on
the verge of a complete severance of sanity so they cannot be used as a good
example of that influence.
On the other hand the people in the country have been
splintered and separated far more so than in recent generations, giving strong
indication that during his leadership his words and his actions have influenced
the way we as a people act and respond.
We are less inclined toward kindness and goodness, we are more
susceptible to negativity and race related issues. We are more selfish and less giving. Is all this directly related to Obama,
probably not but one could make the inference because of him, we are what we
are.
History will record whatever those in power want to portray
but the reality; ok my reality is that during these past 6 years our country
has plunged into immorality, selfishness and separatism in such a dramatic way
that the only standard factor of influence has to be Barrack Hussein
Obama. It is his example and the
influences of those he surrounds himself with that have created the issues of our
day.
Rush Limbaugh wished that he, Obama, would fail as a
president and at the time I thought that was a mean thing to say, give Obama a
chance. But Limbaugh is right; I wish he
would have failed instead of succeeding gloriously at almost everything he
believed in. Obama has succeeded in
creating a level of hate between races that hasn’t existed since the
sixties. He has transformed our
government into a weak and untrustworthy partner for those other countries who
have relied upon our goodness and mercy (don’t go there, I know we have issues
and we’re not a perfect country but there is no one even close to what we are
in the area of support, democracy and individual rights, no one, so forget
about your stupid little quips about Sweden’s health care or Holland’s drug
laws…)
Obama has taken a bad situation and thrown mud over it, spit
upon it and then stopped on it ‘tell it can barely move. He spouts honesty and openness but is the
most secretive and divisive leader in three generation, since Woodrow
Wilson. He has done nothing to increase
our security and in fact has gutted our military and increased our dependence
on foreign oil by supporting failed solar projects hamstringing coal production
and stopping important oil projects. He
has overseen the expanding debt to an unprecedented 6.5 trillion and for those
in special education classes that’s 6,500,000,000,000. And to those who say so
what?
President-elect
Barack Obama said Tuesday the deficit appears on track to hit $1 trillion soon.
Speaking to reporters after meeting with top economic aides, Mr. Obama said:
"Potentially we've got trillion-dollar deficits for years to come, even
with the economic recovery that we are working on."
— Associated Press, Jan. 6 ......What economic recovery?
— Associated Press, Jan. 6 ......What economic recovery?
He knew back then what a trillion was and he knows now what
6.5 trillion does and will continue to do to our economy and yet he has acted
not toward reducing those numbers but toward inflating them, a purposeful act.
Under this president (that would be Obama) our country for
the first time has more Americans receiving government aide than those who are employed
full time. At the same time he has gone
on a spending spree that makes drunken sailor look like an altar boy, using the
printing press to finance his spending, saddling future generations with a debt
so large that it may never be repaid and causing our credit rating to hit an
historic low.
From Benghazi to Travon Martin, to Obama Care, he has
divided the country and in that division has succeeded in conquering his detractors
while literally transforming foundationally the precepts of this once great
country. I too wish he had failed but his successful
presidency has overcome and has dominated every aspect of our lives changing
who we are, what we are, what we can do and possibly who we can become.
Can we as a people overcome what has been done to us? That is the question of the day. I think we can but it will be a fight and a
struggle to overcome what has been placed in our way. The worst part is that most of our leaders actually
like what Obama has done, it only makes their jobs easier, even if it continues
to make our lives less livable.